Skip to content
First grill
Six things to fix before launch day.
6
to fix
2
strengths
Grill · 16 Oct
10
Raw
Round 1 of 2
First viewport of YouBeyond as captured
What we read · 16 Oct, 08:43

“The page is a philosophical inquiry, not a product launch, leaving visitors with nothing to buy.” 

Level 1 of 4 · Raw

30 points to Undercooked
all open: 43
now 10
Raw 0–39UndercookedCooked 60Well done 80
6
locks on this page
+33
points in reach
43
could reach · Undercooked
Badges
  • ✓First grill
  • Cooked — reach 60
  • Well done — reach 80
  • Before and after — finish round 2

What will go wrong on launch day

Fatal · they leave before they understandCostly · they understand and still leaveDrag · it works, and could work better
  1. FatalClarity · C1 failup to +8.4
    Potential problem
    “"Would you clone yourself?"”

    A visitor does not know if this is a software tool, a movie, or a survey and leaves.

    Proposalyou decide
    AReplace the headline with a category-defining statement, e.g., "The AI platform to clone yourself."
  2. FatalOffer · O1 failup to +3.5
    Potential problem
    “no pricing anywhere on the page”

    The stranger cannot determine if this is a commercial product or a free experiment.

    Proposalyou decide
    AAdd a clear offer, such as "Join the free beta" or a pricing table.
  3. CostlyAudience · A1 failup to +1.1
    Potential problem
    “no audience named”

    The page appeals to general curiosity rather than a specific buyer's need, killing conversion.

    Proposalyou decide
    AExplicitly name the target user, e.g., "For creators who want to scale their presence."
  4. CostlyProof · P3 failup to +2.2
    Potential problem
    “![A woman beside her digital double](/assets/hero.png)”

    The use of conceptual art instead of a UI makes the product feel like vaporware.

    Proposalyou decide
    AReplace the hero illustration with a screenshot of the actual product interface.
  5. DragClarity · C2 failup to +8.4
    Potential problem
    “"More possibilities."”

    The visitor sees a vague adjective instead of a concrete result they can value.

    Proposalyou decide
    AReplace with a specific outcome, e.g., "Be in ten places at once."
  6. DragClarity · C5 partialup to +3.8
    Potential problem
    “"Explore the possibilities"”

    The CTA is too vague to signal exactly what happens after the click.

    Proposalyou decide
    AChange the label to "Watch the Demo Video".

Don’t break these

The visual aesthetic is clean and professional.
The "No signup. No cloning" text effectively reduces friction for the poll.

The four axes

Every point comes from a test. Open a row, or read the rubric.

Clarity35% of the score
25
C1
"Would you clone yourself?"
fail
C2
"More possibilities."
fail
C3
"Would you clone yourself?"
pass
C4
First viewport focuses solely on digital cloning.
pass
C5
"Explore the possibilities"
partial
2 passed · 1 partial · 2 failed → 25. Weighted at 35%, this contributes 8.8 of the overall 10.
Audience18% of the score
0
A1
No audience named on page.
fail
A2
"Imagine a digital version of you"
fail
A3
No problem or pain stated before the product.
fail
A4
No payer identified.
fail
0 passed · 0 partial · 4 failed → 0. Weighted at 18%, this contributes 0.0 of the overall 10.
Offer29% of the score
4
O1
No pricing or cost mentioned.
fail
O2
No tiers provided.
fail
O3
No price to match against outcome.
fail
O4
"Keep me updated"
fail
O5
"No signup. No cloning. Just your opinion."
pass
1 passed · 0 partial · 4 failed → 4. Weighted at 29%, this contributes 1.2 of the overall 10.
Proof18% of the score
2
P1
No numbers, named users, or changelog.
fail
P2
No specific, checkable proof.
fail
P3
Hero image is a conceptual illustration.
fail
P4
Does not make false claims, but provides no evidence.
partial
0 passed · 1 partial · 3 failed → 2. Weighted at 18%, this contributes 0.4 of the overall 10.
8.8 + 0.0 + 1.2 + 0.4 = 10.3 → 10.
Full page read.
Share

Grill your launch before your customers do.

Free. No card.