O2 · Legible
One of the 18 tests every grill uses. Offer is 29% of the score.
The test, as the critic reads it
Is it obvious which tier a given buyer should pick, and what changes between tiers?
It is scored pass, partial or fail, and it can be marked as not applying. Every finding filed under it quotes the page. The whole checklist is on one page.
How real pages did
Of the 22 public launches judged on it, as of 1 Oct 2026: 16 passed, 2 partly passed, 4 failed. That is a small sample, from the record, not a survey.
Pages that missed it
- Nektarfailed · 68 Cooked · 1 Oct 2026
“Paid plans add unlimited practice sets and detailed analytics”
A visitor cannot determine if the product is affordable or overpriced and leaves without signing up.
- API Keys, without the terminalpartly passed · 74 Cooked · 28 Sept 2026
“Most people pick this (under Monthly)”
The buyer is nudged toward the most expensive long-term option rather than the best value.
- habitleague.iofailed · 72 Cooked · 27 Sept 2026
“no pricing grid”
User doesn't know if there is a free version or multiple levels of service.
- BidKitpartly passed · 87 Well done · 27 Sept 2026
“No future updates”
A developer sees a 'no updates' clause on a JS kit and assumes the product is disposable.
- Fenlofailed · 17 Raw · 8 Sept 2026
no pricing tiers or feature grids on the page
Pages that passed
- Flouiepassed · 59 Undercooked · 1 Oct 2026
Clear Monthly vs Annual Founding Plan
- plume.koumastudio.compassed · 66 Cooked · 1 Oct 2026
Clear distinction between Free (€0) and Pro (€4.99).
- Grow Your Audience on Xpassed · 63 Cooked · 1 Oct 2026
Basic vs Growth tiers have clear feature and limit differences.