P2 · Specific
One of the 18 tests every grill uses. Proof is 18% of the score.
The test, as the critic reads it
Is the proof specific (names, numbers, dates) rather than decorative (logos of tools used, star ratings without a source, "loved by makers")?
It is scored pass, partial or fail, and it can be marked as not applying. Every finding filed under it quotes the page. The whole checklist is on one page.
How real pages did
Of the 23 public launches judged on it, as of 1 Oct 2026: 11 passed, 2 partly passed, 10 failed. That is a small sample, from the record, not a survey.
Pages that missed it
- plume.koumastudio.comfailed · 66 Cooked · 1 Oct 2026
“The resume that lands interviews.”
A skeptical visitor sees a bold claim without evidence and assumes the result is exaggerated.
- Grow Your Audience on Xfailed · 63 Cooked · 1 Oct 2026
“No testimonials or named users”
A visitor sees a polished UI but has no evidence that this tool actually grows audiences.
- AI Visibility Monitorfailed · 92 Well done · 1 Oct 2026
“The demo report for Northline Studio, a fictional brand”
A stranger cannot verify if the tool works on real-world data or just generates plausible-looking mockups.
- StackContextfailed · 41 Undercooked · 27 Sept 2026
“absence of testimonials or user numbers”
The product looks polished but unproven, increasing the perceived risk of installation.
- MyKaydfailed · 51 Undercooked · 26 Sept 2026
“Amina Yusuf, Daniel Smith”
These are mock data in UI screenshots, but a stranger may mistake them for testimonials and feel deceived.
Pages that passed
- Flouiepassed · 59 Undercooked · 1 Oct 2026
"Late-Night Doubt is Physical Fatigue Disguised as Philosophy"
- Nektarpassed · 68 Cooked · 1 Oct 2026
"28 App Store ratings", "12,000+ Words and collocations"
- API Keys, without the terminalpassed · 74 Cooked · 28 Sept 2026
400+ services recognized