Skip to content
Re-grill · 2 Nov · Round 2 of 2 · final

UncensoredLabs landing page review

64
Cooked
was 52
Level up

Higher than 34 of the 53 other launches on the public record (64%)

0100

Each dot is one launch’s latest public grill · 6 Nov

“The page proves the product works but uses jargon and buries the primary pain point.” 

First viewport of UncensoredLabs as captured

What we read, 2 Nov at 04:15, at laptop width.

Visit uncensoredlabs.dev
Clarity35%
49
+17.1
Audience18%
56
+10.1
Offer29%
64
+18.6
Proof18%
100
+18.0
The sum 63.8, so
64
Measured, not scored
What the page does, not what it says.
measured 2 Nov · our browser, desktop 1280 × 800 · link check · axe-core
Largest paint, desktop
1.9 s
target ≤ 2.5 s
Layout shift
0.014
target ≤ 0.1
Links on the page
0 broken
30 checked
Accessibility
3 issues
elements must only use permitted aria attributes; aside should not be contained in another landmark; landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination

These do not change the score. The score comes only from the 18 tests; speed and accessibility are reported beside it because a slow or broken page loses people before they read a word.

Second grill
52 → 64 in 6 days.
2
locks opened
0
still there
5
new
52 → 64 in 6 days

What moved, and what is left.

Fatal · they leave before they understandCostly · they understand and still leaveDrag · it works, and could work better

Opened since round 1 the test behind it now passes

  1. “Prepay your credits”
    Offer · O5 partial → pass · Offer 49 → 64
    +4.3
  2. GLM-5.3 Abliterated $1.40 / 1M
    Proof · P2 partial → pass · Proof 77 → 100
    +4.1

New this round

  1. 01FatalClarity · C3 failnewworth +11.2
    “abliterated”

    A stranger reads 'abliterated' and doesn't know if this is a technical term or a typo.

    Proposalyou decide
    Replace 'abliterated' with 'refusal-free' or 'unfiltered'.
  2. 02CostlyClarity · C2 partialnewworth +5.3
    “Pay for the tokens your product uses.”

    The visitor sees a billing method instead of the result they get from using the API.

    Proposalyou decide
    Replace this line with the outcome, e.g., 'Build AI agents that never refuse a prompt'.
  3. 03CostlyAudience · A3 partialnewworth +3.8
    “Refusal-style example”

    The most convincing proof of the pain is buried far below the first viewport.

    Proposalyou decide
    Move the refusal vs. uncensored comparison to the first viewport.
  4. 04DragOffer · O4 failnewworth +10.4
    “One payment. 30 days of usage discounts.”

    There is no urgent reason to sign up today rather than bookmarking for later.

    Proposalyou decide
    Add a limited-time launch bonus, such as 'Double credits for the first [X] users'.
  5. 05DragAudience · A1 partialnewworth +3.8
    “your product”

    The visitor isn't explicitly told if this is for them or a different type of user.

    Proposalyou decide
    Replace 'your product' with a specific user, e.g., 'for developers building unfiltered AI agents'.
2 strengths

Don’t break these.

  • The 'Refusal-style example' comparison clearly demonstrates the product's value proposition.
  • Pricing is transparent and immediately accessible in the first viewport.
Up from Undercooked

Level 3 of 4 Cooked

round 1: 52
now 64
0406080
2 of 5
locks opened
+12
this round
64
final score · Cooked
Badges
  • ✓First grill
  • ✓Cooked — reached 60new
  • Well done — no round left on this launch
  • ✓Before and after — +12new
Every point from a test

The four axes

Every point comes from a test. Open a row, or read the rubric.

Clarity35% of the score
49
C1
One API for uncensored and abliterated models.
pass
C2
Pay for the tokens your product uses.
partial
C3
abliterated
fail
C4
Uncensored AI. Chat. Create. Build.
pass
C5
Try Chat free
pass
3 passed · 1 partial · 1 failed → 49. Weighted at 35%, this contributes 17.1 of the overall 64.
Audience18% of the score
56was 39
A1
your product
partial
A2
OpenAI-compatible API, base URL, tokens
pass
A3
Refusal-style example section
partial
A4
Pay for the tokens your product uses.
pass
2 passed · 2 partial · 0 failed → 56. Weighted at 18%, this contributes 10.1 of the overall 64.
Offer29% of the score
64was 49
O1
$1.40 / 1M in
pass
O2
Buy credits when you need them vs Developer/Growth/Scale packages
pass
O3
$0.30 / 1M in
pass
O4
One payment. 30 days of usage discounts.
fail
O5
Free $0.10 trial for eligible accounts.
pass
4 passed · 0 partial · 1 failed → 64. Weighted at 29%, this contributes 18.6 of the overall 64.
Proof18% of the score
100was 77
P1
Logs dashboard screenshot and model catalog
pass
P2
GLM-5.3 Abliterated $1.40 / 1M
pass
P3
Interactive example · sample activity
pass
P4
No exaggerated claims of user counts
pass
4 passed · 0 partial · 0 failed → 100. Weighted at 18%, this contributes 18.0 of the overall 64.
17.1 + 10.1 + 18.6 + 18.0 = 63.8 → 64.
Full page read.
2 grills

Every grill of this page

  1. 52Undercooked26 Oct 2026
  2. 64Cooked2 Nov 2026+12You are here

Your launch, read the same way.

Free. No card.

Ready to launch? The Launch Kit: your agent submits you to up to 85 free directories · $49 →