Skip to content
Re-grill · 2 Nov · Round 2 of 2 · final

Kling 4.0 landing page review

55
Undercooked
was 55

Higher than 17 of the 53 other launches on the public record, level with 1 (32%)

0100

Each dot is one launch’s latest public grill · 6 Nov

“The page is a feature list that hides its cost and gives no reason to buy today.” 

First viewport of Kling 4.0 as captured

What we read, 2 Nov at 07:31, at laptop width.

Visit kling-4.art
Clarity35%
64
+22.4
Audience18%
56
+10.1
Offer29%
14
+4.1
Proof18%
100
+18.0
The sum 54.5, so
55
Measured, not scored
What the page does, not what it says.
measured 2 Nov · our browser, desktop 1280 × 800 · link check · axe-core
Largest paint, desktop
0.6 s
target ≤ 2.5 s
Layout shift
0
target ≤ 0.1
Links on the page
0 broken
9 checked
Accessibility
1 issue
aside should not be contained in another landmark

These do not change the score. The score comes only from the 18 tests; speed and accessibility are reported beside it because a slow or broken page loses people before they read a word.

Second grill
55 → 55 in 5 days.
0
locks opened
0
still there
4
new
55 → 55 in 5 days

What moved, and what is left.

Fatal · they leave before they understandCostly · they understand and still leaveDrag · it works, and could work better

New this round

  1. 01FatalOffer · O2 failnewworth +7.3
    “Pricing link in nav”

    A visitor must leave the sales flow to find the cost, causing them to bounce before converting.

    Proposalyou decide
    Add a pricing table showing the cost of credit bundles directly on the landing page.
  2. 02CostlyOffer · O4 failnewworth +7.3
    “no launch price, limit, or cost of waiting”

    A visitor bookmarks the page to 'try later' and never returns.

    Proposalyou decide
    Add a launch-specific incentive, such as [number] free credits for the first [number] users.
  3. 03DragAudience · A3 failnewworth +7.9
    “Kling 4.0 is Kling AI’s multimodal video model”

    The product is introduced before the problem, failing to build tension or desire in the buyer.

    Proposalyou decide
    Insert a section before the product intro describing the frustration of short, uncontrollable AI clips.
  4. 04DragClarity · C3 failnewworth +12.6
    “multimodal video model”

    A visitor who does not already know the category reads this jargon and stops reading.

    Proposalyou decide
    Replace with 'AI that combines text, images, and sound'.
3 strengths

Don’t break these.

  • The generator interface preview in the first viewport shows the product immediately.
  • The 'What Can Creators Make' gallery provides clear, concrete use cases.
  • The Kling 3.0 vs 4.0 comparison table provides specific, checkable technical improvements.
Same level as round 1

Level 2 of 4 Undercooked

round 1: 55
now 55
0406080
0 of 4
locks opened
+0
this round
55
final score · Undercooked
Badges
  • ✓First grill
  • Cooked — reach 60
  • Well done — no round left on this launch
  • ✓Before and after — +0new
Every point from a test

The four axes

Every point comes from a test. Open a row, or read the rubric.

Clarity35% of the score
64
C1
Kling 4.0 AI Video Generator
pass
C2
Make Cinematic Videos Up to 30 Seconds
pass
C3
multimodal video model
fail
C4
Make Cinematic Videos Up to 30 Seconds
pass
C5
Create Your First Video for Free
pass
4 passed · 0 partial · 1 failed → 64. Weighted at 35%, this contributes 22.4 of the overall 55.
Audience18% of the score
56
A1
for Creators
pass
A2
social clip, product video, or cinematic scene
pass
A3
Kling 4.0 is Kling AI’s multimodal video model
fail
A4
for Creators
pass
3 passed · 0 partial · 1 failed → 56. Weighted at 18%, this contributes 10.1 of the overall 55.
Offer29% of the score
14
O1
Pricing link in nav
partial
O2
no pricing table on the page
fail
O3
Pricing not on page; cannot judge market match
not applicable
O4
no launch price, limit, or cost of waiting
fail
O5
Create Your First Video for Free
pass
1 passed · 1 partial · 2 failed · 1 not applicable, removed from the count → 14. Weighted at 29%, this contributes 4.1 of the overall 55.
Proof18% of the score
100
P1
Kling 4.0 examples
pass
P2
Up to 10 keyframes
pass
P3
Generator interface screenshot in first viewport
pass
P4
Comparison table between 3.0 and 4.0
pass
4 passed · 0 partial · 0 failed → 100. Weighted at 18%, this contributes 18.0 of the overall 55.
22.4 + 10.1 + 4.1 + 18.0 = 54.5 → 55.
Full page read.
2 grills

Every grill of this page

  1. 55Undercooked28 Oct 2026
  2. 55Undercooked2 Nov 2026You are here

Your launch, read the same way.

Free. No card.

Ready to launch? The Launch Kit: your agent submits you to up to 85 free directories · $49 →