Skip to content
First grill
Four things to fix before launch day.
4
to fix
3
strengths

ResumeAdapter

Visit resumeadapter.com
Grill · 7 Sept
90
Well done
Round 1 of 2
First viewport of ResumeAdapter as captured
What we read · 7 Sept, 22:34

“The page is highly polished but hides pricing at the bottom, risking bounce from price-sensitive users.” 

Level 4 of 4 · Well done

the top level
now 90
Raw 0–39UndercookedCooked 60Well done 80
4
locks on this page
3
strengths
Badges
  • ✓First grill
  • ✓Cooked — reached 60
  • ✓Well done — reached 80
  • Before and after — finish round 2

What will go wrong on launch day

Fatal · they leave before they understandCostly · they understand and still leaveDrag · it works, and could work better
  1. CostlyOffer
    Potential problem
    “05 · Pricing”

    A price-sensitive visitor must scroll through 10,000px of content to find the cost, contradicting the 'Transparent pricing' claim in the comparison table.

    Proposalyou decide
    AAdd 'Plans from $9' text immediately below the first CTA button.
  2. DragOffer
    Potential problem
    “Pricing section”

    There is no penalty for waiting; a visitor bookmarks the page and never returns because there is no immediate incentive to buy today.

    Proposalyou decide
    AAdd a time-limited launch discount or a 'First 5 scans free' limit to drive immediate conversion.
  3. DragClarity
    Potential problem
    “Review my resume (free)”

    The word 'Review' often implies a human service; a visitor may hesitate, wondering if they are signing up for a manual audit or an automated tool.

    Proposalyou decide
    AReplace the CTA label with 'Scan my resume (free)'.
  4. DragProof
    Potential problem
    “Join 300k+ job seekers”

    A round number like '300k+' without a source or verification feels like a generic marketing claim, eroding trust in the subsequent testimonials.

    Proposalyou decide
    AReplace with a specific, non-rounded number, e.g., 'Used by 312,405 job seekers'.

Don’t break these

The 'Typical Resume' vs 'Optimized Version' visual comparison clearly demonstrates the product's value proposition.
The role-specific examples (Nurse, Accountant, etc.) prove the tool's versatility across different industries.
The 'Them vs Us' comparison table effectively positions the product against known competitors.

The four axes

Every point comes from a test. Open a row, or read the rubric.

Clarity35% of the score
100
C1
ResumeAdapter scores your resume against any job posting
pass
C2
so you pass the ATS and land the interview
pass
C3
Headline 'Your resume is good. So why no interviews?'
pass
C4
First viewport focuses exclusively on adapting resumes for interviews
pass
C5
Button 'Review my resume (free)'
pass
5 passed · 0 partial · 0 failed → 100. Weighted at 35%, this contributes 35.0 of the overall 90.
Audience18% of the score
100
A1
Join 300k+ job seekers
pass
A2
pass the ATS, missing keywords, land the interview
pass
A3
Your resume is good. So why no interviews?
pass
A4
Addressed to the job seeker who is applying
pass
4 passed · 0 partial · 0 failed → 100. Weighted at 18%, this contributes 18.0 of the overall 90.
Offer29% of the score
64
O1
PRICING link in header and '05 · Pricing' section
pass
O2
24-Hour Pass vs Executive subscription
pass
O3
$9 one-time fee is low-friction for the promised outcome
pass
O4
No launch price, limit, or cost of waiting stated in the copy
fail
O5
30-Day Refund, Cancel Anytime
pass
4 passed · 0 partial · 1 failed → 64. Weighted at 29%, this contributes 18.6 of the overall 90.
Proof18% of the score
100
P1
Testimonials from Gwendal Breton, Thomas Thirion, etc.
pass
P2
Specific tools mentioned: 'CI/CD, Jenkins and SonarQube'
pass
P3
Screenshots of 'ATS Score 62%' and 'Bullet Point Surgery'
pass
P4
Detailed role-specific examples for 80+ roles
pass
4 passed · 0 partial · 0 failed → 100. Weighted at 18%, this contributes 18.0 of the overall 90.
35.0 + 18.0 + 18.6 + 18.0 = 89.6 → 90.
Full page read.
Share

Grill your launch before your customers do.

Free. No card.