“The page is polished and clear, but relies on fictional data instead of real-world proof.”
- Clarity
- 100
- Audience
- 100
- Offer
- 100
- Proof
- 56
For solo founders in the week before launch, whose only feedback so far is from friends. Paste your page: a score out of 100, the lines that will lose a stranger, and what to change first.
“The page is polished and clear, but relies on fictional data instead of real-world proof.”
A real public grill, unedited. Open it in full →
Nothing that isn’t on your page. Every point traces to a named test, quoting your own words, and the score prints its own sum.
Four axis scores, and the sum that makes the total.
“The page sells a feature to everyone; nobody who lands here knows whether it is for them.”
Twenty words, no softening clause, and it has to hold up against your own page.
Ranked by what each costs you on launch day, each with one or two changes you could make this afternoon.
Cards 01–03: what a grill of a weaker page returns. Example.
There is no private option and nothing to pay for one. That is the trade, and there is no signup to read any of them.
We went through the directories and the landing pages ourselves. Here is what the numbers said.
The one a stranger lands on. Not your docs, not your repo. That page is what decides.
We load your page the way a first-time visitor does, top first, and hold it to a written checklist.
Make a change, and 24 hours later grill the same page again, the second and last grill, to see whether it moved.
A playbook for each directory that your coding agent (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor) follows in your browser, starting from a brief written from your grill.
You’re a solo founder, the launch is next week, and the only feedback you have is from people who want you to feel good. The feedback that would have saved it exists — it just arrives after the one shot is spent.
Free. No card.